2. Other Compelling In-game Evidence That Supports Indoctrination


Choosing Synthesis or Control turns Shepard into a Husk with Illusive Man eyes?



High resolution version of image here. (Note: Can't find original source for this image)

Why is it when choosing either Synthesis or Control, Shepard is seemingly turned into a husk? This could be good evidence that these two option are in effect Indoctrination. Being turned into a husk is well established as a form of advanced Indoctrination. One in which all higher mental functions are lost.

And why does Shepard's eyes turn into ones that match those of the Illusive man?

It is revealed in the 4 part Mass Effect comic "Evolution" that during the First Contact War the Illusive Man was exposed to ancient Reaper artifact on Shanxi that caused this change in his eyes.

Others that were exposed to this activated Reaper relic were turned into a fully indoctrinated form much like a husk. The Illusive Man only came partially into contact with it while saving a friend and was able to escape with less severe changes. The main one being this change to his eyes, the other being an ability to read the glyphs written by the other husks-like creatures.

The Illusive Man says that the artifact is "a booby trap. It's creators planted it to alert them to the presence of advanced species - and to transform them into something they could control."

So it would seem that The Illusive Man's eyes were given to him by being exposed to Reaper tech that was used to Indoctrinate people.

This gives weight to the argument that what is happening to Shepard when choosing these options is indeed part of the Indoctrination process.

The Best Counter-Argument

Shepard's eyes can turn into something that looks a lot like that if going full Renegade, so it may not be a clue to anything other than Shepard having synthetic eyes.

And the Catalyst did say Shepard would die with those two options. It might appear that Shepard is being turned into a husk but is merely just dying in a way consistent with Reaper tech.

Shepard, Anderson and the Illusive Man


I have mentioned how the scene where Shepard meets the Catalyst is the most dream like, but there is plenty of strangeness leading up to that part too.

First of all when Shepard wakes up from being hit by Harbinger's laser all your weapons are gone. However conveniently you find what appears to be Anderson's gun. So where is Anderson? How come he dropped his gun by Shepard but is nowhere to be seen, even though he is going to follow Shepard into the beam soon.

There is more gun strangeness but I have moved that to section 3 "Clutching at Emergency Induction Ports".

Then there is how strange the corridors are on this part of the Citadel and why they resemble the Shadow Brokers ship and the Collector's ship. Is this the art department being lazy and reusing assets? Or is it because Shepard is constructing these area's based on memories of other things? This would also go some way to explaining the "1M1" writing (see 3c) in an area that no organic has ever been, least of all one that can read human English!

Then there is all the strangeness with Anderson being nowhere to be seen after being hit by the laser, but he claims to follow you into the beam. Then comes out somewhere else, seems to see completely different things to Shepard and somehow manages to reach the panel before Shepard. And Anderson appears to be unharmed in anyway, even though he has lost all his weapons?!

Then when Shepard and Anderson are confronted by the Illusive Man. The Illusive Man appears to control both Shepard and Anderson. Under the Illusive Man's control, Shepard is made to aim the gun at Anderson. During this oily shadows can be seen around the screens edge. The Rachni queen mentioned "songs the color of oily shadow" in reference to Indoctrination.


Also alien voices, whispers and Reaper sounds can be heard too, very much like those described in the Codex and in Shepard's dreams.

I think we can be certain that what the Illusive Man is doing to control Shepard and Anderson is related to  Indoctrination. And while there is no precedent of anyone controlling another person in such a direct way as to make them aim a gun at someone against there will, the oily shadows and alien voices should be seen as proof that Shepard is the victim to a form of Indoctrination at this point.

When the Illusive Man makes Shepard aim the gun at Anderson, Anderson also raises his hand to mirror Shepard but has no weapon. Then the Illusive Man makes Shepard shoot Anderson in the left side of his stomach. When he does this we hear what sounds like two grunts, one from Anderson and the other from Shepard? The same place where Shepard has been clutching since waking up from being hit by Harbingers laser.

Anderson clutching his wound
Then after more attempts to convince the Illusive Man he is wrong and has been Indoctrinated, the Illusive Man stands behind Anderson and appears to take a gun from behind Anderson.

This is especially weird because: -

a. The gun he takes is NOT Anderson's gun. Shepard appears to have that.
b. Anderson does not appear to have a gun anywhere upon him earlier in the scene.

Anderson does not have a gun on his back
Maybe the Illusive Man brought the gun himself? Well he also does not appear to have a gun at any other time in the scene. And nowhere to hide it either! Interestingly the gun the Illusive Man produces from who-knows-where is a Predator model. The very same model Saren used when Shepard was able to convince him to shoot himself! Coincidence? Or is Shepard piecing this together from memories?

Finally either Shepard shoots the Illusive Man or convinces him to shoot himself. Either before or after the Illusive Man shoots Anderson.

Shepard walks over a fully flat platform
Shepard walks over to the control panel and opens the Citadel's arms. Then if Anderson is alive he goes and sits beside him or by himself. Here's what's strange with this, Shepard and Anderson sit against a raised platform that was not raised merely seconds ago. Why did it raise up? So Shepard and Anderson had somewhere to sit? Did opening the Citadel arms raise it? Why?

UPDATE: Thanks to LoneIrbis' flycam video of the ending we can actually see that opening the Citadel does in fact cause this platform to raise! Really strange! Why would that happen!?

See it here.

Mere seconds later the center circle has raised so they can rest against it!
Then after they have a chat and Anderson appears to die, Shepard looks down and appears to have a wound that is bleeding profusely in the same place that Anderson was shot.


If there is no relevance to this then why show it? If it's just to show us how injured Shepard is, surely it's unnecessary. We have been controlling Shepard stumble about since the laser, we understand Shepard has seen better days!

And finally probably the most important fact of this strange scene. Why is it that if Shepard is successful in saving Anderson from TIM, Shepard only needs 4000 EMS (rather than 5000) to "wake up" alive after choosing Destroy? A fact that is confirmed in the Official Guide.

Anderson still dies a few minutes later. Apparently from the gun shot wound from Shepard, which is also odd because it would take much longer to die from that sort of wound. Especially when you consider how much worse Shepard it.

Why would Anderson living for a few minutes more be worth an extra 1000 EMS?! All he does is sit down and talk to Shepard for a minute. That hardly adds to the war effort.

The only way this makes sense is that Shepard saving Anderson represents an element of successfully resisting Indoctrination. If TIM represents the Indoctrination and Anderson represents the part of Shepard's mind resisting Indoctrination, only then does this fact make sense. 

The Best Counter-Argument

Again the best counter arguments to most of this is bad writing. Shepard was previously holding that same area to Anderson being shot so maybe the fact the wound is the same place is a coincidence?

The magically appearing gun again could be poor writing or the art department forgetting to give Anderson a gun before that point. And it's not the first time a gun has appeared from nowhere in Mass Effect.

The Dreams: Ghostly Presences,  Oily Shadows and Alien Voices


As mentioned before there are three dream sequences in the game. These dreams seem to contain several clues that they are related to Indoctrination.

Ghostly presences made from oily shadows

First Dream Sequence: Shepard chases the boy (who at this point is laughing) through a foggy woods. Once Shepard catches up to the Boy a Reaper is heard and they are both bathed in red light. The boy runs away and the Reaper light and noise is gone. When Shepard catches up with the boy the second time he looks at Shepard with a sad face and is engulfed in flames.

Second Dream Sequence: Shepard approaches a bench where the boy is sat that is surrounded by ghostly presences that are made of oily shadows! Shepard also hears whispers presumably from the oily shadows, some of them call Shepard's name. When Shepard reaches the bench the boy is lit by a Reapers red light and the Reaper horn is heard, the boy runs. Wrex can be heard saying Shepard's name (not sure if this only happens if Wrex is dead for you). Shepard reaches the boy again, cue the Reaper light and horn, the boy flees again. The whispers increase. Once Shepard reaches the boy he is again engulfed in flames.

Third Dream Sequence: More ghostly oily shadows and whispers calling Shepard's name. Now the child runs from Shepard right away, and there is no more laughing from him. Wrex and Mordin can be heard calling for Shepard (again not sure if this only happens if they are dead). Shepard reaches a clearing and looks on, seeing the boy run into the arms of another version of Shepard, this version of Shepard looks up and smiles back at Shepard and so does the boy. They are both engulfed in flames.

The ghost like presences, oily shadows and alien voices are all consistent with Indoctrinaton.

Many people have spent time trying to figure out some of what the whispers in the dream say. And while none of these are "confirmed" because they are very hard to hear for sure. Here are some lines that people claim to be able to hear -

"don't trust him"
"Get back commander"
"Someone outside is coming"
"Stay away from him, trust yourself"


But most telling of all, when Shepard wakes up from any of the dream sequences the screen is bathed in a white light as a transition showing the movement from dream to reality. Here is a screenshot -




It's also the same dissolve when Shepard exits the Geth Consensus and when entering the beam. Here are some comparison frames showing this.

Dream
Geth Consensus
Getting hit by Harbinger's Laser / Entering the Beam / Rising platform to the Catalyst
Is it merely a coincidence that the transition dissolve Bioware chose to use after Shepard is hit by Harbinger's laser is the VERY same one used to symbolize a transition from a non-reality to reality?

I think this alone is VERY strong evidence that Shepard is dreaming at this point.

The Best Counter-Argument

Sorry but the only counter argument I have seen to these points are that they are all merely a coincidence. If anyone has anything better please let me know.

Of course the whispers are mere guess work, they are very hard to hear.

The Plot Holes, strangeness and Illogical Story Elements


There seems to be a rather massive amount of elements in the final 20 minutes or so of Mass Effect 3 that just don't make a lot of sense. The fact that many of these problems go away if you view them through the lens of the Indoctrination Theory seems to add more credence to it being true. It could be that many of these are explainable, or that the Extended Cut will fill in the gaps that make them make sense. But it could also be that they are all small clues to a bigger picture.

Here is a list of things that seem to be explainable if Shepard is in large part hallucinating/dreaming everything after being hit with the beam. But taken literally seem to not make much sense at all.
  • Why is it that after being hit by Harbinger's laser Shepard wakes up CLOSER to the beam than when hit? Surely it would have knocked Shepard backwards not closer!
  • Why is it that after waking up and beginning to stumble towards the beam Shepard hear's this -
Marine: Did we get anyone to the beam?
Major Coats: Negative. Our entire force was decimated.
Major Coats: It’s too much. We need to regroup. Fall back to the buildings…
Marine: Hammer's wiped out. All forces, retreat.
Marine: Pull back! Pull back!
Is Major Coats simply unable to see Shepard and Anderson still stumbling towards the beam?
And based on the final cut scene with the Normandy the two other squad mates that came with Shepard were also alive!


How the HELL did our squad mates survive Harbinger's laser and get back on the Normandy seemingly unwounded in any way? I'll come back to this in a moment.
  • How is that when Shepard looks around when stumbling toward the beam there is no sign of Anderson who claims to "follow" you into the beam?
  • What is with these strange bodies by the Mako before the beam -




They were not there before Shepard got hit with the laser. And they seem to bare a strong resemblance to Ashley and Kaiden in Mass Effect 1. Except they are bald, making them look more like dolls.


Are they supposed to be a manifestation of Shepard's guilt at not being able to save everyone? Since one of these two dies in ME1 and the other was seriously injured at the start of 3. Or are they simply meant to show that a lot of people have died trying to get to the beam? Or have been collected by the Reapers and placed by the Beam? If so why is there thousands of them and they all look the same? And why do they look so crap? Did the art departed really become that lazy at this point and just mapped a crap texture of two dead humans onto some low polygon piles to show all this sea of corpses? Why? What is so important about them to even bother? If you were not going to make them look good why not just leave this area how it was BEFORE Shepard is hit by the laser?
  • Why does Shepard lose all weapons? Why does Shepard find what appears to Anderson's gun on the floor after waking up? Where is Anderson at this point? Since Anderson does not appear to have a weapon when you reach the control panel it certainly seems he dropped his somehow besides Shepard while also not being anywhere in sight and then "following" Shepard into the beam?
  • Why is it this new gun Shepard picks up does not need to be reloaded and never runs out of ammo?
  • Why is Anderson referred to as "Anderson" in the subtitles before being hit by the laser and "Admiral Anderson" afterwards?
  • Is there any significance to the trees around the beam area? They seem very unusual after Shepard is hit by the beam.
  • Why is it that this new section of the Citadel bares many architectural similarities to the Normandy, The Shadow Brokers ship and the Collectors Base? 
  • Why is the corridor leading to the control panel full of dead bodies? Also note they do not resemble those by the Mako except they are also bald and doll-like. They are however fully rendered models not a terrible 2D texture. Were they all brought there after being killed? Why? If they have a purpose then why are they so strangely scattered?
  • Why are there Keepers in the corridor working on "invisible" control panels?
  • Why does Anderson come out of the beam at a different place to Shepard?
  • Why does Anderson reach the control panel before Shepard after entering the beam afterwards?
  • Why does Anderson mention moving walls that Shepard never sees?
  • How is it that the beam takes Shepard and Anderson to a place where they only need to walk through a few corridors and they are exactly where they needed to be? At a control panel that opens the arms. If the beam was being used by The Reapers to transport humans to the Citadel for the supposed purpose of making another Human Reaper, where are the Reaper forces working to do that? Why do the Reapers have the transport beam open at all if no Reaper forces are using it? When Shepard and Anderson get there all they find is dead bodies, Keepers that appear to be doing nothing and a path leading directly to the control panel to open the Citadel arms thus leading to the failure of the Reapers plans! None of this makes any sense!
  • Where does the Illusive Man come from? How did he get there? Also we are told that the Reapers moved the Citadel to Earth because the Illusive Man who is Indoctrinated told them it is the Catalyst. Why then does he still believe he is working against the Reapers until Shepard is able to convince him otherwise? When Saren was Indoctrinated the Reapers had promised he and others would be spared by Synthesis but it seems unlikely that the Illusive Man would have believed the Reapers would just let him control them.
  • Why can the Illusive Man (who has at this point clearly very Indoctrinated), control Shepard and Anderson's movement? There is no precedent in the games before this that anyone could have this ability.
  • Where does the Illusive Man magic a gun up from? He appears to take it from Anderson but Anderson did not have a gun at this point.
  • Why does Hackett contact Shepard out of the blue, with no prior contact since Major Coats claimed everyone was dead and now Shepard is alive and was the one that opened the Citadel arms? Why did Hackett not try and contact Shepard before this point? Not even to say "Shepard!? Are you there? Was it you that opened the Citadel's arms?"?
  • Why was Joker running from the flight? Is it that after Major Coats reports that everyone is dead, he swings by to pick up the squad mates (who inexplicable are on the Normandy at the end), although nobody bothers to look for Shepard and as soon as Shepard activates the Crucible he see's the resulting wave and is quick enough to almost outrun it?
I said I would come back to this, so here it is. The fact that Shepard's squad mates that were either fighting on the surface of London or part of the assault on the beam in which everyone was "decimated", turn up unhurt and on the Normandy is one of the biggest offenders in those final scenes. As far as I can tell everyone hates the lack of logic or explanation here.

Even if we conclude that while Shepard was unconscious on the ground the squad mates were picked up, we have to ask why they left Shepard. If we conclude that our Squad mates retreated (very out of character), why did they do so while so unharmed? Maybe they were picked up while Shepard was passed out again on the Citadel (Shepard may have been unconscious for an unknown amount of time after dealing with the Illusive Man and speaking to Anderson)? But why would they not continue the assault on the beam? Even if they thought Shepard was dead, anyone should be able to complete the mission. Why give up? Especially when Harbinger retreats!
  • And by some miracle the Normandy crash lands on some utopian looking planet with a perfect atmosphere for life? How many are those in the galaxy anyway? What are the odds?
What about the things the Catalyst claims? Evidence it's all part of an Indoctrination attempt? Or is the Catalyst simply lying to Shepard?
  • The idea that organics being protected from being wiped out by synthetics by being periodically wiped out by some synthetics makes very little sense. And is very unconvincing as the Reapers overall motive. It's at best deeply flawed circular logic. The Catalyst would have us believe that Synthetics are destined to wipe out their creators, and finally all organic life. But not only does this contradict the lessons we learned from the Geth/Quarian conflict but there is no basis of evidence to support the notion that Synthetics are destined to want to wipe out all organic life at all.
Let's consider this. If all Synthetic life had to have been created by organic life by it's very definition. And the Reapers are Synthetic, then why did the Reapers not wipe out all organic life? The Catalyst offers us nothing more than contradictory circular logic.

In order for it to be true and explainable it would require massive presumptions that are not offered or hinted at in the game. At the very least this would be appalling storytelling. Something Bioware do not have a history of.
  • Why is the Catalyst's "solution" proven not viable anymore simply because an organic made it to the control panel on the Citadel? Or is it simply because we were able to complete the Crucible? What does either of those have to do with the claimed inevitable synthetic genocide against organics?
  • If the Reapers created the Citadel why did they bother to even create the Decision Chamber along with appropriate places for someone to "Control" or "Destroy" them? Did they foresee organic life building the Crucible and eventually making it there and wanted to provide them the options? 
  • Why is it that despite the claim that the Destroy option will kill all synthetic life along with Shepard because of being "partially synthetic", both Shepard and EDI can be seen alive afterwards?
I'm sure I will add a lot more to this list later when they occur to me or people point them out but for now I think you can see there is enough to have some serious questions about the ending. Indoctrination Theory does help answer most of these by claiming most of it is a dream/hallucination and the illogical nature of a lot that happens is because of that.


The Best Counter-Argument

Unfortunately while I could list possible explanations for all these inconsistencies they all still add up to the point that they are ridiculous and require far too much suspension of disbelief to accept the explanations.

The most common and seemingly strongest overall argument against any of these things supporting an Indoctrination Theory is simply that Bioware wrote a terrible ending that doesn't make sense. There is no hidden meaning, it's simply crap writing.

The Weapon Bob


It is extremely interesting to note that in the last mission, Priority Earth there is suddenly a slight amount of weapon bob that happens with your cursor. This is exactly the same effect that occurs after Shepard is hit with Harbingers laser, only more subtle. This did NOT exist earlier in the game!

It even occurs on the Weapon Select screen! See the video courtesy of BSN user MegumiAzusa -


Could this be a hint at early signs of Shepard becoming under the influence of Indoctrination? Can anyone seriously argue that this is because Bioware were lazy? This was clearly done on purpose, if not related to Indoctrination, what could that purpose be?

The Best Counter-Argument

Bioware were going to have this in all the game and forgot to take it out of the last mission (this is a very unconvincing counter argument, but the best I have).

Continue reading with -

35 comments:

  1. Hi, thanks for these awsome posts! First of all sorry for my English(not my first language) but I wanted to add some things about oily shadows. First of all, if you walk through them instead of chasing little boy you will hear everyone that died because of you,I heard Legion,Mordin,Thane,Kelly,Kaiden so yeah,you hear Wrex only if he died. Also, I once read an argument that said the Rachni queen only thinks that oily shadows were caused by Reapers, and that they don ´t have to be responsible for Rachni Wars, but if you spare her in ME 2 you will meet an asari that works for her( on Illiyum I think,don ´t know if I wrote that right xD) and she pretty much confirms that it were Reaprs(I can make a screenshot or found an exact dialogue). And one more thing,if you in ME 3 in prologue look below building before shooting Husks,you will see that little boy running through LOCKED door and after you get down that builiding gets hit by Reaper beem,and afterwards you can found him in that climatization thing xD so i think thats really weird. If I think of some more things I ´ll let you know(and if I can :D) Lets hope that Bioware don ´t screw that DLC...alright thats all bye :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks. I will investigate and capture video from the scene with the Asari in ME2.

      I already have the video of the boy running through the locked door in Section 3 (be sure to click the MORE EVIDENCE button at the bottom of the page).

      Thanks again

      Delete
    2. Sorry, I was reading your blog on my mobile and didn´t notice it. I was just coming to apologize that you already have it :D. Anyway, here is the vid about Rachni queen http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLHOdqUEW0k The part I was talking about starts on 3:39... as I said, the Asari isn´t sure, but it seems that queen is sure about it. Sorry once again about that kid xD. Bye

      Delete
    3. Oh no problem! I just wanted to make sure you didn't miss all the other juicy info on the next pages!

      Thanks for the vid, I'll investigate shortly and add the relevant info!

      Delete
  2. Wow, even more evidence appeared! Thank you so much.
    I must also apologize for my not-so-perfect English, but here's what I thought of recently. It's a feeble argument, but I hadn't noticed it anywhere yet. It might just be me, but ME3 reminds me of another EA game, Dead Space. At first, the similarities aren't many - there are silent walks in open space, glowing line on the back of Shep's armor, fighting husks. But most importantly - Isaac Clarke (DS protagonist) was somehow changed by an alien Marker(!), there's a Convergence(!) being triggered in the end, Isaac is gradually going insane and has visions of his dead girlfriend Nicole (whom he couldn't save) and in the end... I'll just quote Wiki if I may: "As Isaac approaches the Marker, the Nicole vision suddenly pulls him into his own mind(!). There, Isaac encounters the parts of his mind affected by the Marker(!) and the Nicole vision(!), who then reveals that the only way to make the Marker "whole" is to absorb the body and mind of the one who created it—in this case, Isaac himself(!)." The final battle is happening in Isaac's mind (though it's pretty obvious, no indoctrination tricks there).

    I'm not saying anything, but BioWare MIGHT've been influenced. It's EA game too! I'm also very sorry if somebody mentioned it already.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have always found this theory fascinating, and your article seems to cover all the bases here. It's very well-done and thorough and I hope you don't mind if I refer this link on my blog :) I am currently writing an article on this very issue. There is certainly compelling evidence to support the Indoctrination Theory, some of it is almost irrefutable that you begin to ask that this was what the developers intended all along, guess we won't know til the Extended Cut arrives but until then this theory certainly holds a lot of water.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. By all means link to my guide on your blog! I wrote it for people to read, the more exposure the better.

      Thanks for the kind words.

      Delete
  4. The bodies that look remarkably like cadaverous versions of Ashley and Kaiden are there before the alleged indoctrination attempt. During the charge to the citadel beam, pull out your sniper rifle and and look to either side of the beam. I guarantee you'll see the bodies. Also, in Mass Effect 2 I found a couple of bodies that look similar to the "Ashley" cadavers during the mission in the Collector ship. I'm not saying they're the same, but they are similar.

    ReplyDelete
  5. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KU1Hx-M4D9o

    Check this video out, especially around the 3:20 mark. You'll hear something very disturbing and interesting....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Another thing about Coates I think should be mentioned. Why is it that Shepard does not attempt to contact Coates and contradict his assertion that the entire unit was wiped out? Presumably, we are hearing Coates over Shepard's radio; and Shepard is fully capable of communicating with others, as is evident from his conversations with both Hackett and Anderson on the Citadel. So, why is it that Shepard does not even attempt to communicate with the person who is overseeing the charge on the Citadel? I know this is a minor point when compared to the other egregious things that occur in the ending, but it has always bothered me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Also, how the hell did Joker not sustain any injuries when he crash-landed on a planet? He has Vrolik syndrome! He should have been utterly destroyed. Then again, maybe Bioware overlooked this so they could have that Garden of Eden ending. I don't know....

    ReplyDelete
  8. You mentioned Hackett, and there is something that has been bothering me ever since I beat the game. When Hackett contacts Shepard, he claims that the Crucible isn't firing. He is very concerned about this, as he should be, but when Shepard ascends to the Star Child, Hackett, apparently, loses all interest in the Crucible, as he doesn't contact Shepard for the rest of the game. Really? He doesn't even seek an update?

    Hackett: "Shepard, what's taking so long with the Crucible?"

    Shepard: "Well, there's this ghost child telling me that he created synthetics to kill organics, so that the organics won't create synthetics that will kill the organics."

    Hackett: "... What?"

    Shepard: "Dont ask, don't ask...."

    ReplyDelete
  9. Noticed something else (although it's not really indoctrinated related). When Shepard comes face to face with the "Kid" in the vent, "An End, Once And For All" is playing subtly in the background. Maybe a bit of foreshadowing on Bioware's part. After all, music is used as a storytelling device to reference characters (and other things). Star Wars is a great example of this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In classical music, it's called a leitmotif http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leitmotif

      Delete
  10. Another item of note: Shepard doesn't just lose his/her weapons after getting hit by the laser. He/she also loses the ability to use biotic and tech abilities; as I found out when my Vanguard Shep tried to take out those husks using my preferred method, warp.

    After my Shep was hit by that beam, I thought I did something wrong. I even wound up letting the husks kill Shep on the first attempt, because I couldn't understand how she could take out enemies with one crappy pistol and no biotics.

    That said, while I like what people have done with IT, I'm still willing to chalk all this up to bad storytelling. There's just so much wrong with Priority: Earth well before you get to the beam, that it's pretty obvious that Bioware ran out of time. The dreamlike qualities of the final ten minutes could simply be storytelling conceit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Seems an absurd stretch to me to say that Bioware accidentally left all these great clues for something they did not intend rather than they did intend them.

      Also seems more likely that legandary great writers, know for great twists at Bioware came up with a brilliant but too subtle twist rather than they wrote a terrible nonsensical ending.

      Also they do not make games in the order you play them. The final part of the game was not done last, so it would not have been "rushed". The end of the game would have been written very early in production and worked on throughout.

      When games are rushed in the final months it results in bugs and possible sections cut out. Not sections written poorly. The writing is often still having final touches and improvements at those late stages but the idea they rushed the ending makes little sense in game development.

      When you know this about game development you realize that everything in that final mission is how it's meant to be, very purposely. You think that great writing staff at Bioware did not notice all those plot holes? Not a chance.

      Delete
    2. According to Bioware's own admission, they didn't come up with the ending to the game until November 2011, when they were looking at a March 2012 release date. That's four months (even including the holiday season which is lost time for most companies) to storyboard, write code, bring in voice actors, do quality control, send the game out to whoever/whatever creates the physical copies.

      I guess they could be lying about coming up with the ending at literally the last minute, but that seems pretty far fetched to me.

      Delete
    3. No that is an absolutely incorrect statement. Bioware have NEVER stated anything as absurd as coming up with the end as late as November 2011!

      They have repeatedly stated that the whole game including the end was worked on from the start of development. Yes certain elements changed along the way, but it is simply NOT true that they came up with the ending 4 months before release. They have NEVER said that.

      In fact in the Final Hours of Mass Effect 3 app they clearly state that they were refining elements of TIM's lines in November 2011. So the end was DONE all that was left was tweaking. They can not be tweaking the lines AND writing a whole new ending.

      It would be insane for a developer to wait until 4 months from release and then decide to write the ending.

      Also the beta was leaked Nov 4h and the ending in the script in that beta was almost identical to the final game.

      I don't know where you got your information, but it's simply false.

      Delete
  11. Er, I'm sorry, but is there something wrong with my previous comment here (as "Insomnia", about ME3 and DS2 similarities)? I'd really like to know what you think :) It's just that every single other comment gets an answer, but not mine :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL, sorry. I am pretty busy at work. I did read your comment but didn't get a chance to reply.

      Interesting thoughts on the Dead Space 2 connection. I however have not played it, so not much I can comment on in that regards. Could be that it influenced Bioware to some degree though.

      Delete
    2. Oh, ok) I was worried that my comments were blocked or something)
      Anyway, BioWare bave been using lots of material from other movies, games etc. so I wouldn't be surprised. It's just that the more I think about this, the more DS2 and ME3 endings seem alike.

      P.S.
      And thanks again for all your hard and incredible work at collecting all the data here!

      Delete
  12. During the second dream sequence, turn off the music and just listen to the sound effects, you'll hear an assortment of Reaper sounds. You might have to increase the volume of your television or computer to hear them though.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I posted on an outdated site, sorry. I just want to thank Lee for compiling all of this. It is quite an achievement by itself. As I said in the other post, I was a skeptic, but now do believe the Shep is under the influence of something. Whether that is indoctrination or some kind of mind battle between her and the Reapers, I don't know. I do believe that the ending we got is it. There's nothing else to come and that the final battle between Shep and the Reapers took place both in Shepard's mind and in the real world at the same time. Though I may not agree completely w/ IT, this is still a fascinating read and a lot of fun to explore. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hey Guys!!! So here is something that doesn't make any sense(surprisingly lol)When Shepard gets teleported to the Citadel he goes through something that looks like collectors ship(room No 1)and then shadow brokers ship. You can see engine the same as in SB Ship in ME2. So I read the comments of people who dont believe in IT and they say it makes sense for engine that big to be located on citadel since the Citadel is the one huge Spaceship/station. But no it doesnt when you go through this second room you are basically already in Citadel Control Room. How could ,whoever build the Citadel, have placed the biggest engines in the galaxy into the smallest part of citadel. Citadel Control Room is just a tiny place its like a molecule compare to the all other part of citadel. Wouldnt it make more sense to put those engines in Citadel arms one per each arm? Just my thoughts on what I read on internet, btw havent seen anybody talking about wrong placement of what it looks like Big Sparkly Engine from ME2 in control room, just thought i'd share it with you guys

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good point. It would be a very odd place for an engine.

      Delete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
  16. Hi! Look at the EC page.
    http://bit.ly/KRUMSX Tali is talking with green-eyed Geth!!! :O
    (no spam/virus link, this is a shortened link with a picture)

    ReplyDelete
  17. I wanna add something else, the room where the platform raises and where Anderson dies is complete BS, there is no other path or walkway for Anderson to have come up without meeting Shepard somewhere along the way. Anderson describes the dark hallways in present tense, meaning that he must have been in the samee hallway for that scene to make any sense

    ReplyDelete
  18. I noticed something else. You know Anderson's gun, the one you pick up after being hit by Harbinger? That was clearly a Carnifix, and everyone knows that a Carnifix holds only 6 rounds per thermal clip. Then how come I was able to use exactly 13 rounds to put down the husks and marauder without having to reload? Not even an extended clip holds that much ammo.

    ReplyDelete
  19. http://social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/355/index/9872108&lf=8

    https://twitter.com/masseffect/status/179687674049867776

    @masseffect Do you think fans can become indoctrinated by Bioware

    @reibback_flam Shhh.... Absolutely not! *shifty eyes*

    This was Bioware's plan. To pull a Mass Indoctrination on their own customers. They've succeeded in doing so.

    Charles. The gun that you have is a special gun specifically made for the ending. Going by how the game engine works, they used the same model, but modified the gun to have no scope, infinite ammo, as well as a 999 mag size (ammo per clip), unlike the regular Carnifex which behaves differently. The gun even fires faster than the regular Carnifex.

    This isn't a mistake or anything, it was done on purpose to simulate that what you are experiencing is not really happening.

    Reaper indoctrination corrupts organic minds. The final 20 minutes of the game do not take place in the real world. They take place in Shepard's mind.

    ReplyDelete
  20. This whole concept has me hooked almost as much as I am hooked on the games. I've been thinking about it a lot and decided to set up an account here just so I could post this. See, there are things we are not considering that I believe support this theory.

    There are 3 things we know when it comes to future Mass Effect games:
    1. They are in the processes of making one
    2. It will not star Commander Sheppard
    3. Its a good idea to hold on to your saves files from the other games
    What we haven't asked ourselves is where the Mass Effect 3 endings leave us as far as a potential Mass Effect 4. As these endings both leave the Normandy crew stranded and involve destroying the Mass Relays (Necessary to give players the whole galaxy in future games) and there have been no other interesting wars involving humans in which they had contact with the rest of the galaxy (not just the turians but everyone else to) these endings do not seams to lead to a Mass Effect 4 which we know is coming.

    We also know that the Reapers generally take years if not decades to wipe out a galaxy. We know from our prothian friend that in his cycle people lives whole lives never seeing either the end or the beginning of the Reaper war. He himself was born after the Reapers took the Citadel and grew to adulthood during this war. What if YOUR commander Sheppard the way YOU set him up in 1 2 and 3 with the skills and appearance YOU game him or her ends up being the protagonist in the next game. It's been done before. Star Wars 1 2 and 3 were intended to show that even in 4 5 and 6 it was supposed to be the story of Darth Vader. What if when Sheppard wakes up still dealing with the indoctrination the war continues with an indoctrinated Sheppard leading the Reaper charge?

    For that matter, what if Bioware did this intentionally to get us to think crazy things so we could inadvertently create the story for the next trilogy? What if they intended the fans they created to rebel against the game maker that created them so that we could decide what happened at the end of Mass Effect 3. What if the indoctrination theory is true not because Bioware made it that way but because the ending was designed so that we could give it the meaning we wanted to?

    ReplyDelete
  21. I don't personally believe the same version of IT that everyone else does. It's kind of similar to a post on the BSN titled "Mass Effect 3 Ending is a Masterpiece"

    http://forum.bioware.com/topic/284491-mass-effect-3-ending-is-a-masterpiece-spoilers-are-imminent/

    Only difference being, it is not a dream, but rather a virtual realty world constructed by Harbinger. Using Shepard's memories. Seeing as the ending chapter of the Final Hours App is titled "The Perfect Illusion" and going by the "Master of Illusion" trope, everything within the ending sequence fits that to a T. With past sci-fi, I know that any changes in the virtual reality world affect what happens in the real world (think Geth Consensus).

    So shooting the tube (in destroy) will set off the Crucible and kill the Reapers in one swoop. Then Shepard wakes up and everything is silent at the end. Same goes for control/synthesis. Choosing synthesis, will harvest everyone (that can be harvested. Squadmates are indoctrinated to serve for slave labor (harvesting codex entry)), give them Reaper DNA (Final Hours App), and everyone becomes loyal to the Reapers (as per EDI). Control? Well, essentially take "assuming direct control" and apply that to everyone in the galaxy. You are now like TIM.

    Ending is also kind of similar to something the Rachni Queen said in the first game (for those who think this may have been planned ahead of time, as a certain article noted that the ending was in the works from the beginning of ME1 with multiple versions (dark energy, indoctrination, Shepard being an alien, TIM Reaper boss, etc).

    Rachni Queen: I do not know what happened in the war. We only heard discordance. Songs the color of oily shadows (TIM, Starchild).

    If you look very closely at the Starchild scene, you'll notice:

    Shepard: I need to stop the Reapers. Do you know how I can do that?
    [camera pans over slightly, shows the oily shadows in the kid's hair]
    Starchild: Perhaps, I control the Reapers. They are my solution.

    Rachni Queen: A tone from space, hushed one voice after another. It forced the singers to resonate with it's own sour yellow note (indoctrination). Then we awoke in this place (Earth). The last echo of those who came out of the singing planet (Earth). The sky is silent (no more indoctrination, because Reapers are destroyed). Shepard wins, mass relays intact, and Joker/everyone else did not crash on that planet. That is just part of the indoctrination process (Reapers resulting control of Shepard's limbic system makes him susceptible to believing whatever they tell him).

    ReplyDelete
  22. Its been a long time since I played the games so I do not know if it makes sense but while reading some of your work and the links your provided I came onto something. There is a moment when the illusive man says: see what power they wield, see what they can do? What if the illusive man is saying this to the reapers? Because in the end, sheperd is synthetic in a way and Anderson is organic I think? Like I said it has been a long time since I played the games, I just go with what you and others wrote. So in a way, when Sheperd shoots Anderson it is a syntethic life form that kills a organic life form. Are the reapers not there to prevent this from happening? That synthetics kill all organic life? But sheperd did not do this on his own, he was controle by illusive man. What if illusive man is in a way the Catalysator? That he really controls the reapers. That he controls everything. In that way it is easy for him to make Sheperd shoot Anderson and why he does that he says to the Reapers: look what power they wield (Sheperd as synthetic) look what they can do (Sheperd shooting a good friend which is organic) All for giving the reapers a good reason to end all organic live form. Is Illusive man organic or syntethic? Does he really need to be afraid of the reapers killing all organic life form? Was his apprentice, the girl that contacts Sheperd and builds him up in a way also not syntethic in a way? Is it to far fetched to believe illusive man is also syntethic? What about his eyes? Why does Sheperd get the same eyes when he chooses to control the reapers? Is this not prove that Illusive man, who has the same eyes, controls the reapers? But this is probably not true because I really do not know anything about the game anymore and I can only go on what I read here... Sorry if it is stupid what I say but these things came to my mind while reading it. What if illusive man never wanted to destroy the reapers but wanted to make sure that the reapers destroyed the only person who could destroy him? Shepperd.

    ReplyDelete